acemoglu et. al., the consequences of radical reform (2009)
(4) effects of FR were positive, but didn't show up till 1850 [mechanisms in this argument are essentially Smithian--freeing of people from 'fetters']
(5) Radical reforms can be more efficacious than limited reforms [responding to Burkean wisdom]
(7) [Terrible lit review!]
(9) Guild restrictions as 'fetters'
(13) in most places Napoleon made 'a genunine attempt' to implement reforms
(22) postivie effects started showing by 1900, process kicked in by 1850 [difficulty is that there were a series of political upheavals before this--admittedly, they attempt to control for varoius things. but they don't control for impact of 1848 rev. too much happens in the interim]
(31) [Data hardly supports the notions that fetters were 'burst']
(4) effects of FR were positive, but didn't show up till 1850 [mechanisms in this argument are essentially Smithian--freeing of people from 'fetters']
(5) Radical reforms can be more efficacious than limited reforms [responding to Burkean wisdom]
(7) [Terrible lit review!]
(9) Guild restrictions as 'fetters'
(13) in most places Napoleon made 'a genunine attempt' to implement reforms
(22) postivie effects started showing by 1900, process kicked in by 1850 [difficulty is that there were a series of political upheavals before this--admittedly, they attempt to control for varoius things. but they don't control for impact of 1848 rev. too much happens in the interim]
(31) [Data hardly supports the notions that fetters were 'burst']
No comments:
Post a Comment