(3-4): stress on 'objective environmental factors'--as power resources are better distributed, political structures likely to reflect this [makes sense--but an evolutionary model?!]
(40): Lipset hypothesis--more well-to-do (education, urbanization, etc.), more likely to sustain dem. Vanhanen saying, unlike Aristotle, Lipset forgets about condition of equality.
(41): moderately positive correlation between ec. development and dem. but causality is different story.
(42): Dahl mentioning that dispersal of means of violence/coercion necessary
(43): O'Donnel rebuttal to Lipset that modernization --> authoritarianism (but, of course, we've had redemocratization in the 80s, so this needs to be checked)
(44): Gastil and 'ideas' [hah]
(45): Linz and 'leaderhship's importance', parliamentarism/presidentialism, etc., etc.
(45): Huntington's several factors: (1) well-being; (2) absence of extreme inequalities; (3) pluralism;, w/ bourgoeisie; (4) market-oriented economy; (5): dem states?; (6): tolerant culture. but no testable hypothesis.
(45): Berg-Schlosser's agrarian structure--small-scale farming enables democratic structrues
(46): Diamond/Lipset/Linz offer no theory, just enumerate factors
(48): darwinian theory!?
(50-51): argument--concentration of power resources leads to autocratic structures [of course, all will depend on operationalization of 'power resources']. democracy is a compromise between competing groups of equal strength.
(52): the IPR
(56-57): imp-- concentrated landownership as barrier [see cited literature]. Vanhanen using 'family farms'
(61): a measure of economic centralization/decentralization -- means of production controlled by relatively independent groups (becomes public sector, foreign sector, concentrated private sector) [hmm]
(65): he gets his IPR by combining an IOD, IKD, and DER
(77-79); table of correlations, 1980 -- int. that many of the contradictory cases do become democracies, soon after
(88-92): account of changes through the 1980s, many of which support the general hypothesis here [clearly there is something to the claim, of course--but the question of specific causality is much murkier than he wants to make it seem]
(92): Pakistan contravenes hypothesis, not ready to be dem by IPR calc
(109): against ethnic cleavages/homogeneity as a meaningful variable
No comments:
Post a Comment