liberalization and business lobbying in india, stanley kochanek (1996)
(157): ability of business associations to influence the regulatory regime was severely limited due to relative autonomy of the State [in other words, more-or-less the opposite of the explanation given by Vivek for problems of 'license raj']
(158): business not particularly involved in the process of liberalization ('invluence very limited')--not their lobbying that explains it, but external and internal crises.
(160): Indira Gandhi's rise to power in 1969 was a 'shift to the Left', ruining long-standing relationship between Congress establishment and elite business families
(168): Bombay Club, in 1993, emerged as industrialists opposed to reform process--unwilling to be opened up to international competition
(169): interesting--FICCI strongly endorsed Bombay Club's critique of reforms, CII's approach was more subtle (even though many of its members were in Bombay Club)
(169): imp--again, reforms were the work of a "small technocratic elite"
(170): no constituency behind Rao reforms
(171): like Kohli, reforms are understood not as dramatic, but halting and responsive to resistance of powerful sectors
(157): ability of business associations to influence the regulatory regime was severely limited due to relative autonomy of the State [in other words, more-or-less the opposite of the explanation given by Vivek for problems of 'license raj']
(158): business not particularly involved in the process of liberalization ('invluence very limited')--not their lobbying that explains it, but external and internal crises.
(160): Indira Gandhi's rise to power in 1969 was a 'shift to the Left', ruining long-standing relationship between Congress establishment and elite business families
(168): Bombay Club, in 1993, emerged as industrialists opposed to reform process--unwilling to be opened up to international competition
(169): interesting--FICCI strongly endorsed Bombay Club's critique of reforms, CII's approach was more subtle (even though many of its members were in Bombay Club)
(169): imp--again, reforms were the work of a "small technocratic elite"
(170): no constituency behind Rao reforms
(171): like Kohli, reforms are understood not as dramatic, but halting and responsive to resistance of powerful sectors
No comments:
Post a Comment