divide and conquer?:
If the Bush administration is successful in its current efforts to divide Islam by pitting Shi'ites against Sunnis it will revitalize the old colonial tactic of divide and conquer, and maintain the domination of the Middle East by authoritarian elites allied with the U.S. and the international energy industry. Its vehicle, according to The New York Times, is an 'American backed alliance' of several Sunni-dominated regimes, including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, and Egypt, 'along with a Fatah-led Palestine and Israel.' The anti-Shiite front will also likely include Turkey and Pakistan.
(...) Suddenly, rhetoric like the 'eastern tide' and the 'Persian menace' have begun appearing in official newspapers in the region, although the average Arab does not view Iran as a threat. A recent Zogby International poll of Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) found that roughly 80% of those polled considered the United States and Israel the biggest threats to their security, while only 11% listed Iran. Further, fewer than 25% believe Iran should be pressured to halt its nuclear program, while 61% think Iran has the right to a nuclear program even if it results in nuclear weapons.
(...) One major concern for the United States is oil. While oil production in the United States, Mexico, and the North Sea is declining, U.S. consumption is predicted to increase by one-third over the next 20 years. By 2020, two-thirds of all U.S. oil will be imported, and since 65% of the world's remaining oil reserves are in the Middle East, one doesn't have to be a conspiracy theorist to conclude a strategy of divide and conquer is aimed at keeping strategic control of those resources.
(...) Keeping up tensions in the Middle East is also enormously lucrative for U.S. arms companies. Since 2006, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Oman have spent-or will spend over the next year- more than $60 billion on arms purchases.
(...) Who cannot remember that to contain the so-called 'Shiite Crescent' after the 1979 revolution, the extremism of the fundamentalist Salafi movement was nourished by the West-only to transform into Al-Qaeda and the Taliban?
(...) While the Shi'a are often represented as a single entity, there are in fact enormous differences among Shi'a communities. They are a majority in Iran, but Persians are ethnically different than Arabs. The Shi'a constitute the bulk of the Muslim population in Lebanon, but Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has been sharply critical of Iraq's Shi'a government for working hand in glove with the U.S. occupation. Yemen. Traditionally they 'are under represented,' according to Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'Socially and economically, Shi'a communities are more marginalized, less educated, and poorer.' The fact that Shi'a communities-particularly in Lebanon and Iraq, but also in Saudi Arabia-are suddenly on the radar screen has less to with any kind of Iran-driven conspiracy than with growing resistance to the sect's traditionally second-class status in the Middle East. The 'divisions' are political and economic, not sectarian, says Abdel-Latif.
(...) As London School of Economics Middle East expert Fred Halliday points out, the distinctions 'are small, far less than those between Catholics and Protestants in Christianity,' and conflict between the two is 'essentially a recent development, a product of the Middle East political crisis in recent decades.' For instance, Shi'ites and Sunnis have intermarried and shared holy sites for centuries.
(...) Halliday argues that the wars in Kashmir and Afghanistan encouraged the division because militant Sunni groups were the heart of the resistance. The real divisions may be small, but religious conflict has always been a surrogate for something else. In Ireland it divided native Irish from Protestant settlers and kept the two at one another's throats. In Egypt, the British manipulated Copts against Muslims, Christian Greeks against Muslim Turks in Cyprus. As the Irish found out to their woe, small differences, if linked to a wider policy, can turn esoteric matters of theology into a life and death matter. 'These fires, once lit, can destroy forms of co-existence that have existed for centuries,' points out Halliday.